MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001872376

<研究ノート>働き方の現状と課題 : 『ブラック的』な働き方に関する考察

2015· article· en· W7001872376 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHosei University Repository (Hosei University) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcosystem dynamics and resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvertimeHarassmentQuarter (Canadian coin)Work (physics)Working hoursAction (physics)NothingWork environment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The issue of illegal conditions and harassment ignored at the workplace that put employees in dire straits is one that has received much attention in recent years. This paper analyzes the results of a survey conducted on workers (both regular and nonregular) under the age of 35 to determine what working styles are present in their workplaces, particularly to what extent so-called “black” work exists, and how employees who are not yet managers are addressing it. The survey revealed the following: First, when we asked whether their place of employment could be considered a so-called “black company” that uses illegal work hours or treats workers as disposable, 22.1 percent of respondents said yes. This percentage was higher for both regular and non-regular employees at small- and medium-sized companies and for non-regular employees at large companies, compared to regular employees at large companies. Furthermore, there was a clear trend for higher percentages where labor unions were not present. Second, there are many workplace and workingstyle concerns at places employees identified as “black companies,” including too much overtime and difficulty taking time off, a poor environment for employee growth, and little\ncommunication between supervisors and their\nstaff. Third, only 36.9 percent of respondents are taking some kind of action regarding these workplace issues, such as consulting with a supervisor. Of those respondents who believe their workplace is a “black company,” more than half are doing nothing about it. Fourth, one quarter of respondents reported that working long hours had had an adverse effect on their health in the past three years, and 29.7 percent said they were not satisfied with the work at their current place of employment. These numbers were higher for those workplaces identified as “black companies”. Fifth, combined with the 18.2 percent who said a labor union was absolutely necessary and those who said it would be better to have a\nlabor union than not, over half of respondents believe labor unions are necessary. Where respondents considered their place of employment to be a “black company,” the percentage in favor of labor unions increased, showing that much is expected from labor unions with regard to resolving workplace and working-style concerns. These results suggest that issues such as long working hours are cropping up at the workplace; that these issues have an adverse effect on workers’ health and satisfaction levels; and that labor unions, which gather worker opinions and come up with ways to cope with these issues, play an important role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.145
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHosei University Repository (Hosei University)Same topicEcosystem dynamics and resilienceFrench-language works237,207