Le son Rochon : l'évolution de la facture harmonique de Gaston Rochon et son importance dans son processus compositionnel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce mémoire a pour objet la facture harmonique de Gaston Ronchon. Rochon, qui est connu principalement pour son travail avec Gilles Vigneault de 1958 à 1978, est parmi les musiciens qui ont le plus marqué la musique populaire au Québec. Outre son travail de musicien, il a consacré plusieurs années de sa vie à la pédagogie. Il a exercé son travail de pédagogue principalement à l'UQAM où il a mis sur pied le premier programme de baccalauréat en interprétation de la musique populaire au Québec. En premier lieu, ce travail présente une démonstration de la méthode d'harmonisation conçue par Rochon. Le deuxième chapitre présente, par le biais de sa méthode, l'analyse harmonique de quatre chansons du répertoire Vigneault/Rochon et de deux chansons issues de sa période après-Vigneault, et ce, dans le dessein de dégager les particularités du « son » Rochon et de mieux comprendre l'évolution de sa facture harmonique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".