MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001881685

<em>El polaquito</em>

2000· article· es· W7001881685 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHELIN Digital Commons · 2000
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Power (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maquillaje, perfume y tacos.El ltimo retoque en el ascensor.Ella entra y sonre, pero el doctor, el polaquito de ojos verdes: "Ya sabs el resultado?"La mirada seria no responde a su sonrisa y ella no entiende qu pasa.Los ojitos claros no la miran, miran un sobre blanco y l, que ya haba hablado por telfono con el padre, l no le haba contado?No, ella no saba, no le haban dicho nada, y la mano va al pecho sin darse cuenta.Hay algo duro primero, una venda; algo que an duele, despus.Ella

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3060.143

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHELIN Digital CommonsSame topicLaw, Economics, and Judicial SystemsFrench-language works237,207