MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001898341

Loving against the odds: women's writing in English in a European context.

2014· article· en· W7001898341 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative and World Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPluralIntertextualityMillerFocus (optics)Natural (archaeology)Topos theory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For over eight years the editors of European Connections have published studies in Comparative Literature in response to the increasing demand for cross-cultural approaches to literary texts, which -according to Peter Collier, the series editor -can no longer be studied in isolation from their cultural or formal context.Women's writing has become one of these areas calling for interdisciplinary investigation, as critical, national and generic definitions have proved elusive when dealing with the complex experiences of female authorship and readership.In this light, the volume under review (the third within the series devoted to European intertextuality in women's writing in English) acknowledges the existence of a European network of women's writing, which, echoing Arachne's web as a model for a feminist poetics, has articulated a plural female voice often repressed through history. 1 And that must be the reason why the topos of the 'web' -in its different variations like 'network', 'fabric', 'cobweb', 'tissue', 'embroidery', 'tapestry', 'texture' or 'threads' -is repeatedly invoked by the authors of these articles, in their common attempt at adopting what Nancy Miller calls a "critical positioning which reads against the weave of indifferentiation to discover the embodiment in writing of a gendered subjectivity" (1986: 272).Intertextuality, the collection's declared rubric, is effectively achieved at all levels.Although the focus of the articles is texts written in English, their influence, as Elizabeth Russell admits, has "travelled in all directionsthrough connections and links, solidarities and common problems affecting women" (11).And it is not surprising that, in line with this intertextual spirit, the authors have tried to establish a (more or less) successful dialogue between the English tradition and other national and cultural contexts such as Portugal, Hungary, Italy, Spain, France, Germany and Canada.In a similar vein, the diversity of genres, formats and styles explored throughout the volume seems to expand the conventional definition of literary text by including letters, biography, theatre productions or newspaper articles. 1The myth of Arachne has been frequently appropriated by feminist discourse to convey women's re-envisioning of patriarchal cultural patterns.In 'Arachnologies', Nancy Miller's playful account of Ovid's myth, Pallas Athena's illustrations reproduce the patriarchal narratives of authority and power whereas Arachne's illustrations articulate feminocentric protest in showing scenes that contradict the goddess's glorious fables of Olympian history and focus instead on arbitrary crime and abuse of women.In such a context, the weaver's web becomes a powerful metaphor for aesthetic and political subversion which has been endorsed by many female authors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it