MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001917199

L'uso della dieta casalinga nella pratica veterinaria

2014· article· it· W7001917199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNew horizonsGrant fundingNova scotia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visto il crescente interesse dei proprietari di gestire in maniera autonoma l'alimentazione del proprio cane si rende sempre più pressante l'esigenza della figura del veterinario nutrizionista che formuli diete adeguate e bilanciate, anche in caso di patologie. I mangimi dietetici presenti sul mercato non sempre purtroppo possono essere usati sia per la loro scarsa appetibilità sia perché hanno un costo elevato. Questo può portare il proprietario ad interrompere la terapia dietetica vanificando di fatto l'effetto terapeutico della dieta stessa. Il medico veterinario deve essere quindi in grado di formulare diete casalinghe rispondendo alle esigenze del paziente e alla disponibilità del proprietario. Lo scopo della tesi è stato pertanto quello di formulare, nell'ambito dell'attività clinica svolta durante il tirocinio, diete casalinghe in 12 pazienti con diverse patologie (patologie renali, gastrointestinali e allergie). E' stato quindi eseguito il followup verificando l'accettazione della dieta da parte del cane, le eventuali difficoltà del proprietario alla realizzazione del piano dietetico e le risposte cliniche dei pazienti.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of Pisa)Same topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207