MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001944055

Mechanism of eIF2α Kinase Inhibition by Viral Pseudokinase PK2

2011· dissertation· en· W7001944055 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinaseMechanism (biology)Protein kinase RPhosphorylationProtein kinase AASK1In vivoEukaryotic translationSignal transduction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) is a conserved eukaryotic mechanism to limit protein synthesis under stress conditions. Baculovirus PK2, which resembles the C-terminal half of a protein kinase domain, inhibits eIF2α family kinases in vivo, thereby increasing viral fitness in the face of host immunological and stress responses. The mechanism by which PK2 modulates eIF2α stress response signaling remains unknown. To address this issue, a combination of biochemical, biophysical and in vivo approaches were employed to probe the mechanism of PK2 inhibition on a prototypical human eIF2α kinase, the RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR). We discovered that PK2 inhibits PKR catalytic activity by directly binding its kinase domain. This direct interaction requires both the kinase-like C-lobe fold of PK2 and a critical 22 residue N-terminal extension that precedes it. We further show that the PK2 N-terminal extension is required but not sufficient for the ability of PK2 function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFrench-language works237,207