MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001991236

Mapping of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in two small adjacent Arctic watersheds on Herschel Island, Yukon
\nTerritory

2015· dissertation· en· W7001991236 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHelmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostTundraSoil carbonVegetation (pathology)Soil waterThermokarstArcticWatershedSoil map
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permafrost soils are particularly vulnerable to global climate change, and warming air \ntemperatures could turn them from carbon sinks into carbon sources. Estimates of Arctic \ncarbon stocks are still highly uncertain, despite their importance to predict the magnitude of \nCO2 and CH4 release to the atmosphere, a process termed the Permafrost Carbon Feedback. \nBecause most of the Arctic is difficult to access and survey, remote sensing techniques bear the \ncapacity to fill spatial gaps and map the changing landscape at wider scales. Recent studies have \nattempted to use multispectral images, such as Landsat, to estimate soil total organic carbon \n(TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) storage. Yet, most studies worked on a regional to global scale \nand used relatively coarse landscape classes. Since TOC and TN storage is known to be highly \nspatially variable in the landscape, high resolution estimates of TOC and TN storage are \nnecessary to estimate the potential impact of thawing permafrost (and the subsequent release \nof CO2 and CH4) to the atmosphere. This project is one of the first to use high resolution images \n(1.65m GeoEye (4 spectral bands: blue‐infrared), 2m DEM) to predict SOC and TN storage \nwithin different Tundra vegetation classes in a small (3 km²) twin watershed (Ice Creek) on \nHerschel Island, Yukon, Canada. Vegetation classes were based on indicator species and \ngeomorphic disturbance levels. Remote sensing detection accuracy varied strongly between \nclasses. Field based moisture measurements were most strongly correlated with the carbon to \nnitrogen (CN) ratio, TOC and TN (ρ =0.84, ρ =0.74 ρ =0.65, p<0.05). However, slope and the \nnormalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) also had a statistically significant relationship to \nCN and TOC. This suggests that fine scale estimates of carbon and nitrogen stocks are possible \nusing few spectral bands from high resolution images. The active layer of Ice Creek watershed \ncontains 33391 tonnes of TOC and 3635 tonnes of TN, which is lower than the average value \nreported for Herschel Island by the Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database. Carbon and \nnitrogen are not evenly distributed within the watershed. Flat upland terrain and tall erect bush \nareas contained the largest amount TOC and TN. Lowest contents could be found in the steep \nand frequently eroded zones. High carbon accumulation along the stream banks suggests that \nfluvial processes do not remove all the eroded sediments from the watershed. An intensification \nof summer rainfall and warmer temperatures could alter the hydrological patterns of the \nwatershed and current accumulation sites may release more carbon from the catchments to the \nBeaufort Sea. High correlation between soil moisture and TOC and TN contents found in this \nthesis shows that moisture information retrieved from satellite radar data could provide \nadditional information on soil properties. This thesis also shows that detailed studies on \nremobilization of carbon in the catchments and atmospheric losses of carbon are crucial to \nunderstand the role small watersheds play in the face of a changing climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHelmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut)Same topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207