MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7002019689

Microbiomics of Populus

2020· dissertation· en· W7002019689 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExclosureFusible alloyRhizophoraceaeLimitingPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Species of the genus Populus, commonly known as poplars, are one of the most widely used groups of forest trees in North America and Europe. Poplars play a significant ecological role as a pioneer species in the boreal forest, and as a dominant species in riparian forests where they serve as rich wildlife habitats. Numerous natural and artificial hybrids of poplars with superior qualities are widely used in commercial plantations. However, many hybrid poplars are susceptible to the leaf spot and stem canker causative pathogenic fungal species, Sphaerulina musiva which limits the utility of hybrid poplars as plantation trees. At present, there is no control measure to combat the disease caused by S. musiva. The plant microbiome—mainly endophytic microbes—are known to interact with pathogenic microbes and play a crucial role in the ecology and evolution of plants. Understanding the endophytic microbial associations in Poplars along with their interactions with S. musiva is invaluable for developing new methods for combating the stem cankers caused by this pathogen. In the present study, we found a number of endophytic microbes in Poplars that inhibit the fungal pathogen S. musiva and may serve as a potential source to develop biocontrol agents against S. musiva. \n \nIn the first study (Chapter 2), we characterized the endophytic fungal community in Populus species in the Gault Nature Reserve in Mont-Saint-Hilaire, Quebec. We investigated the dual culture interactions of endophytes against S. musiva. We isolated 367 endophytic fungal isolates grouped into 46 genera. Alternaria was the dominant and most common genus isolated. We found certain genera of endophytic fungi were unique to specific Populus species. Only a few endophytic fungi exhibited antagonistic activity against S. musiva and showed differential competitive ability. The endophytic fungus Fusarium sporotrichioides showed the strongest antagonistic activity against S. musiva and can be used as a potential source to develop a biocontrol microbe against S. musiva. \n \nIn the second study (Chapter 3), we investigated interactions between Bacillus velezensis EB14, an endophytic bacterial strain isolated from poplars, and S. musiva. We found significant inhibition of S. musiva by the endophytic bacterium, B. velezensis. We also discovered the production of anti-fungal Iturin compounds (iturin A1, subtulene A, iturin A2, iturin A9 and fengycin) along with four unknown compounds in Bacillus velezensis. In addition, we found that B. velezensis EB14 exhibited varying level of competitive ability against the endophytic fungal microbiome of Populus. \n \nIn the third study (Chapter 4), we elucidated the evolutionary relationships of the isolated Bacillus strain EB14, and performed a comparative genome analysis of the Bacillus velezensis EB14 strain with its closest relatives. We report the 4.07Mbp draft genome of Bacillus velezensis EB14. This genome encodes 12 secondary metabolite gene clusters which includes Surfactin, Rhizoactin, Bacillibactin, Fengycin, Bacillaene, Difficidin, Macrolactin, and Bacilysin. The presence of genes involved in plant bacterial interactions further validates the potential of using Bacillus velezensis EB14 strain to develop as a biocontrol microbe in forestry and agriculture. Furthermore, pan and core genome analysis revealed that Bacillus strains associated with plants possessed genes involved in cell wall degradation, polyketide synthesis, and environment sensors. Most of these genes were clade specific and found in B. amyloliquefaciens, B. siamensis, and the conspecific group of B. velezensis. \n \nThe last chapter (Chapter 5), examines one of the most perplexing questions in endophyte biology: How and why do endophytes produce metabolites similar to host plant derived secondary metabolites? Here, we review the endophyte literature on secondary metabolite production and show that detailed studies are required for conclusive demonstration of metabolite production, as well as to explain the adaptive significance of production of these metabolites by endophytic fungi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)→Same topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity→French-language works237,207→