Meşrutiyet ve Mütareke Dönemleri Cemiyet Yapılanmalarında Babanlar/Babanzadeler
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Second Constitutional was declared on July 23, 1908. With the Second Constitutional Monarchy, an atmosphere of relative freedom made itself felt. In this environment of freedom, it is seen that the Muslim subjects of the Ottoman Empire were involved in the formation of many associations and societies. In the first quarter of the XX. century, the process of Kurdish community restructuring is witnessed under the leadership of active Kurdish family members, including Babans/Babanzades.The end of the XIX. century and the beginning of the XX. Century The societies in which Babans were most active in the first quarter of the century; The Committee of Union and Progress, the Society of Kurdish Solidarity and Progress, and the Kurdistan Forward Society. The Kurdish Solidarity and Progress Society and the Kurdistan Forward Society, which have legal status, are the prominent ones among the Kurdish societies. Among the Babans, there was no one in the formation of the Committee of Union and Progress, which aimed to ensure the continuation of the Ottoman Empire. However, in the society that expanded and grew later, they were in action in accordance with the purpose of the formation of the society. Babans, in the II. Constitutional Period organization, the Kurdish Association of Progress and Progress, and the Armistice Period organization, the Kurdistan Forward Society, along with other prominent Kurdish families, assumed a founding role. In all these societies, the Babans generally took a stance around the ideology of Ottomanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".