MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7002050754

Measurement of the B<sup>+</sup>/B<sup>0</sup>production ratio from the Î¥(4S) meson using B<sup>+</sup>â J/ÏK<sup>+</sup>and B<sup>0</sup>â J/ÏK<inf>S</inf><sup>0</sup>decays

2004· article· en· W7002050754 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesInstitute of High Energy PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungAlfred P. Sloan FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMesonResonance (particle physics)DetectorBranching fractionB mesonElectron–positron annihilationD meson
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a measurement of the production ratio of charged and neutral B mesons from Υ(4S) decays based on the ratio of efficiency-corrected yields for the charmonium modes J/ψK+and J/ψKs0with 81.9 fb-1of data collected with the BABAR detector on the Υ(4S) resonance at 10.580 GeV. We find a value of 1.006 ±0.036(stat)±0.031(syst) for the ratio R+/0= Γ(Υ(4S) → B+B-)/Γ(Υ(4S)→ B0B̄0). © 2004 The American Physical Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0170.016
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.011
Bibliometrics0.0060.014
Science and technology studies0.0120.007
Scholarly communication0.0180.028
Open science0.0170.010
Research integrity0.0070.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207