Modelling current and projected niche shifts of the \nblacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, in eastern Canada \nemploying community science data and global climate \nchange drivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate change rapidly drives species range dynamics, prompting many terrestrial \norganisms to shift northward to higher latitudes and forcing new species-environment and \nspecies-species interactions. The tick vector Ixodes scapularis, commonly known as the \nblacklegged tick, has historically been endemic to the United States but is establishing a \npersistent population in Canada, potentially exposing people to a novel zoonotic pathogen, \nBorrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease. The collection of tick records (within \nCanada and the United States) between 2017 and 2022 via citizen-/community-science programs \nand the usage of high-resolution 1km climate data enabled me to produce robust, ensemble \necological niche models. I carried out 4,704 model iterations across two datasets, 12 algorithms, \nand 10 climate profiles using 40 environmental variables. I extrapolated select models over three \ntime periods, 2011-2040, 2041-2070, and 2071-2100, across two projected climate scenarios, \nSSP5-8.5 and SSP3-7.0, incorporating 2,094 future predictions of I. scapularis distribution. My \nensembles (AUC: 0.9565 ± 0.0065; TSS: 0.8435 ± 0.0155; Kappa: 0.819 ± 0.014) identified \ntemperature, precipitation, biomass production (NPP), length of the growing season, climate \nmoisture index, and the number of yearly degree days as the variables that best explained the \ndistribution of I. scapularis. Further changes to these climate conditions will result in continued \nI. scapularis range expansion, with estimates ranging from ~205% (409,475 km² to 1,247,689 \nkm²) up to ~248% (447,532 km² to 1,556,760 km²) before the end of the century. These \ndistributional niche changes coincide with a northern latitude limit reaching as far as ~48°N by \n2040, ~50°N by 2070, and ~52°N by 2100. These findings highlight the invasive potential of I. \nscapularis, with implications for public health and changing ecosystem dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".