MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7002153065

Nano-encapsulated curcumin in a chinchilla ear model

2010· dissertation· en· W7002153065 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurcuminOtotoxicityAntioxidantCisplatinLimitingAuditory brainstem response
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cisplatin is an extensively used chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of a broad spectrum of tumors. Ototoxicity is currently the most frequent dose limiting side-effect of cisplatinum chemotherapy. Ototoxicity has been shown to be the result of two mechanisms: oxidation, and more recently: inflammation. Various agents have been studied to prevent cisplatin ototoxicity. None has been proven effective in clinical trials to this date. Curcumin, a spice derived from a plant called Curcuma longa, possesses antioxidant activity and inhibits mediators of inflammation. However, curcumin low solubility in water and its low bioavailability limit its use. These issues can be solved using a novel technique called nano-encapsulation. In this research project, we wanted to find out whether curcumin could be nano-encapsulated, and, if so, whether the nano-encapsulated curcumin applied transtympanically is ototoxic, and whether it could be detected in the cochlear fluid and the blood. To answer these questions, a polymer of N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM), N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone (VP), Poly(ethyleneglycol) monoacrylate (PEG-A) was formed. Curcumin was then mounted in this polymer. Different measurements were performed to characterize the created molecule such as the fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, the ultraviolet visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy, and the atomic force microscopy (AFM). Results showed that curcumin was indeed nano-encapsulated. To test the safety of the nano-encapsulated curcumin, it was applied transtympanically to the ears of 5 chinchillas. The hearing was recorded using the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and the distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE). Results of this pilot study showed that the nano-encapsulated curcumin is not ototoxic. To detect the presence of the nano-encapsulated curcumin in the cochlear fluid and the blood, it was applied transtympanically to chinchillas. The cochlear fluids and the blood samples were withdrawn

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207