Metsätieteellisen koelaitoksen julkaisuja 1. 1919
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ILVESSALO, YRJÖ, 1927. Suomen metsät. Tulokset vuosina 1921—1924 suoritetusta valtakunnan metsien arvioimisesta. \nSummary in English: \nThe Forests of Suomi (Finland). Results of the general survey of the forests of the country carried out during the years 1921—1924. \n \n Alkusanat 111-—IV \n Sisältöluettelo V—IX \n Johdanto 1-11 \n \n Tutkimustyön ohjelma ja suoritus 12-40 \n - Työsuunnitelma ulkotöitä varten 12 \n - Ulkotyöt 23 \n - Sisätyöt 26 (Taulukot 1-5) \n - Kuutiomäärän ja kasvun silmämääräisen arvioimisen tarkistaminen 33 (6-7) \n - Tutkimusaineisto 38 (8—10) \n \nTutkimuksen tulokset 41-320 \n - Pinta-alasuhteet 41 (11—43) \n - Kovien maiden ja soiden esiintyminen ja jakaantuminen eri luokkien kesken 64 (36—43) \n - Metsien puulajisuhteet 90 (44—59) \n - Metsien ikäluokkasuhteet 112 (60—70) \n - Metsien tiheys- ja hyvyyssuhteet 138 (71—-75) \n - Metsien puuvarasto 158 (76—98) \n - Metsien vuotuinen kasvu 210 (99—122) \n - Metsien puuluku 254 (123—133) \n - Hakamaanluontoiset metsät 269 (134—147) \n - Saatujen tulosten luotettavuus 290 (148- 156) \n \nEnglanninkielinen selostus. - Summary in English 321—395 \n \nKuvat - Figures 1—31 396—421 \n \nTaulukot - Tables 1—156 1—192
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".