MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7002220864

Multimodal Machine Learning for Climate Adaptation

2024· dissertation· en· W7002220864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAcademic Writing and Publishing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformative learningExtreme weatherClimate changeFlood mythAdaptation (eye)ModalitiesClimate modelWeather prediction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change stands as one of the most urgent challenges of our generation, with devastating floods in Pakistan, heartbreaking earthquakes in Turkey, and unprecedented wildfires in Canada. For over a century, meteorology has traditionally relied on solving dynamical equations, but machine learning (ML) is now emerging as a transformative force. This thesis explores how to use machine learning and optimization methods to address issues surrounding climate change adaptation and sustainable development. The first part of the thesis focuses on developing multimodal machine learning frameworks for extreme weather forecasting. The multimodal ML approach integrates diverse sources and modalities of data, including text-based language, images, and tabular time series. The effectiveness of such an approach is showcased through two distinct case studies in extreme weather forecasting: in Chapter 2, a short-term hurricane forecast with a 12-hour lead time, and in Chapter 3, a long-term flood risk assessment model. Our contributions include the development of a generalizable multimodal ML framework to facilitate a wide range of prediction tasks in meteorology and beyond. Notably, our hurricane forecasting models demonstrate performance comparable to the National Hurricane Center’s top models for 24-hour intensity and track forecasts. ML-driven weather forecasting models offer two distinct advantages over traditional dynamical models: significant reductions in computational time, enabling real-time, location-specific predictions, and the ability to develop long-term risk models for proactive disaster mitigation rather than reactive responses. Therefore, in the second part of the thesis, we delve into two application domains to envision the transformative force in addressing climate change-induced challenges. In Chapter 4, we introduce an Adaptive Robust Optimization (ARO) framework for designing insurance policies, combining historical and anticipatory risks obtained by machine learning models. In Chapter 5, we develop a real-time machine learning framework for wind forecasting, aimed at adjusting factory production levels to minimize air pollution and its impact on surrounding urban areas. In partnership with OCP Group, the world’s largest phosphate producer, our algorithm is now fully integrated into operational systems and reduces hazardous emission impact by 33-47% annually.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Same topicAcademic Writing and PublishingFrench-language works237,207