MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7002319983

Netrin and netrin receptor expression in the adult rat spinal cord : evidence that myelin-associated netrin-1 is an inhibitor of neurite extension

2004· dissertation· en· W7002319983 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetrinReceptorNeuriteSpinal cordCentral nervous system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The netrins are a family of secreted proteins with a well characterized role in directing migrating cells and axons during embryogenesis. Netrin-1 is also expressed in the adult CNS, although its function in the adult is not known. Characterization of netrin-1 in the adult spinal cord indicated that it is expressed by neurons and oligodendrocytes and that following its secretion, netrin-1 is associated with membranes and extracellular matrix (ECM). Netrin-1 attracts or repels different cell types in the developing CNS. The repertoire of netrin receptors expressed exerts a key influence on the response of a cell to netrin-1. Expression of the netrin receptor DCC, required for an attractive response, decreased during spinal cord development, resulting in barely detectable levels in the adult. Conversely, UNC-5 homologues, required for a repellent response, were expressed in the adult at higher levels than during development. These findings suggested that in the adult spinal cord netrin-1 may function predominantly as a short-range cue that inhibits certain forms of plasticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→