MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7002402346

Narrating education: dialogical tools for interpreting adult literacy learners' accounts of school

2007· dissertation· en· W7002402346 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)NarrativeAgency (philosophy)Set (abstract data type)Government (linguistics)Exposition (narrative)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The literature of emancipatory education frequently invokes dialogic co-operation. In this theorized pedagogy, personal narratives are often regarded as a “natural” tool for linking education with learners’ lives. Feminist and post-structuralist critiques have exposed difficulties with critical pedagogy’s “dialogical” imperative to speak out of personal experience, warning against narratives that cater to the desire to see learners as tragic or heroic victims in need of educational rescue. My own analysis suggests that claims about the educational value of learners’ personal narratives may often be based on impressionistic interpretations that need reassessing. In this thesis, I develop more nuanced and systematic methods for such reassessment grounded in Mikhail Bakhtin’s work. A range of data was collected at a suburban adult learning centre; here, I focus on interviews with five learners, all of whom were schooled in Canada and enrolled as adults in a high-school completion program. Analysis is informed by Bakhtin’s concept of dialogism, an interconnected set of concerns expressing the notion that discourse is always riddled with and responsive to what has already been and has yet to be spoken. The most obvious embodiment of this notion is a conversation, and the analysis begins by examining the genre of the “conversational” interview. Bakhtin argues that discourse is also double-voiced, dialogized by echoes of utterances made in other places and at other times, and the analysis moves on to examine, through the tracing of reported speech, how the learners’ accounts orient themselves to the already-spoken-about. Next, I examine the idea of the chronotope. Chronotopes are a useful tool for looking at how learners’ relationships to schooling and literacy are accounted for in terms of tacit conceptions of place and (especially) time, and also for examining what their narratives suggest about how things might have been or might yet be different. The analytical tools drawn from dialogism have proven richly insightful and have allowed me to trace subtleties in the dynamics that produce narrative. The questions and insights about narration generated here can be taken up in practice and extended in further research using “naturally occurring” data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicAfrican Studies and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207