\nEpidemiology, antibiotic susceptibility, and serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae \nassociated with invasive pneumococcal disease in British Columbia - A call to strengthen public health pneumococcal immunization programs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study examined the epidemiology, antibiotic susceptibility and serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae associated with invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in British Columbia. METHODS: Six hospitals and one private laboratory network participated in a prospective, sentinel laboratory based surveillance study of IPD, between October 1999 and October 2000. At each site, S pneumoniae isolates were collected and epidemiological data were gathered using a structured questionnaire, for all cases of IPD meeting the study case definition. Isolates were serotyped and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. Bivariate associations were analyzed and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors associated with hospitalization or death. RESULTS: One hundred three reports and isolates were collected. Seventy-nine per cent of cases were community-acquired, 64% required hospitalization and 5% died. Cases with one or more assessed risk factor for IPD and of female sex were independent variables associated with hospitalization or death. One-third of isolates had reduced penicillin susceptibility and 96% of these represented serotypes contained in the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV-23). Overall, 89% of serotypes identified are included in the PPV-23 vaccine and 88% of isolates from children under five years of age are found in the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-7). Forty-one per cent of cases qualified for publicly funded pneumococcal vaccine and 34% of eligible persons were vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, pneumococcal serotypes associated with IPD in this study closely matched serotypes included in PPV-23 products currently licensed in Canada. Most serotypes associated with IPD in children under five years of age are included in a recently licenced PCV-7. One third of isolates demonstrated reduced penicillin susceptibility, most involving serotypes included in PPV-23. Effective delivery of current public health immunization programs using PPV-23 and extending protection to infants and young children using the PCV-7 will prevent many cases of IPD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".