MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7002456793

The Next Generation: Criminology, Genocide Studies, and Settler Colonialism.

2013· article· es· W7002456793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNeonatal skin health care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismGenocideWork (physics)Face (sociological concept)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este trabajo examino como la criminología del genocidio plantea problemas característicos de la primera generación de los estudios sobre genocidio, tales como comparaciones muy ambiciosas, un legalismo estrecho y una falta de atención a los procesos genocidas Más aún, señalo a la reciente segunda generación de estudios sobre el genocidio que ha sido ampliamente ignorada por los criminólogos, en particular norteamericanos, y que permitiría a la criminología del genocidio superar algunos de sus limitaciones disciplinarias. En particular, apunto a las crecientes áreas de estudios críticos sobre el genocidio colonial y de los colonos que ofrecen lecciones vitales para la criminología del genocidio, usando el ejemplo de las escuelas residenciales en Canadá y de la Escuela Residencial de Fort Alexander en particular, para ilustrar mis argumentos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it