MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7002520089

Nova Law Journal Staff 1981-1982

2019· article· en· W7002520089 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWrightNova (rocket)Nova scotiaWork (physics)First amendment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These are posed and candid photographs of the Nova Law Journal staff and editors from the 1981-1982 academic year. These photographs appeared in the First Amendment yearbook. . The caption reads, "Pictured (Standing L-R): S.B. Ward, J. Seamon, S. Solomon, H. Rosenberg, C. Obront, M. Sherman, M. Bobko, P. Skolnik, K. Rubin, B. Stull, N. Pollock, J. Weinstein, R. Kaib, R. Mehr, G. Ritter, R. Teitler, S. Wright (Seated): H. Muransky, P. Ash, S. Havens, B. Blum, R. Kushner, L. Leonardo."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2470.158

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University)Same topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207