Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Monsoon Bride, considers the position of mixedrace subject within the field of postcolonial literary theory, in particular 'the hybrid' and 'hybridity'. British colonialism is often represented in English language literature, but representations of a subjectivity that breaches the binary of colonizer and colonized are rare; this literary exploration takes place from a 'hybridised' view connecting the two positions. Further, the novel represents AngloBurmese or mixed race 'skin' as racially and culturally ambiguous, problematizing the idea of the authentic and difference when measured against a normative position. The work extends the discourse around hybridity, the authentic and how difference is situated. Drawing from theorists including Homi Bhabha and Trinh T Minh Ha, the novel poses questions such as: do writers representing inbetween subjects write from 'no place'? How can writing define this place at the point of the border and make it intelligible not only for reader, but for commercial publishers? National distribution in Australia is through the major publishers, Text. The unpublished manuscript was shortlisted for the Victoria Premier¿s Literary Awards 2010. The writer received a $5000 Readings Fellowship and residency at The Wheeler Centre. The novel was reviewed across major outlets including: The Age, Sydney Morning Herald, The Australian, Women¿s Weekly, Cosmopolitan magazine. The writer attended literary events including Wheeler Centre First Mondays, UBUD literary festival, Byron Bay Literary Festival, ASEAN literary festival, Irrawaddy Literary Festival, Clunes Booktown. The book was subject of author interviews on ABC Book Show as well as ABC RN Life Matters. Postpublication, the writer was awarded a Canada Council grant and an Asialink residency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".