Bibliographic record
Abstract
ARTIKLAR Hans Åkerberg: Empirisk religionspsykologi i USA och Europa Göran Gustafsson: Berger och Luckmann – nya vägar i religionssociologin LITTERATUR Günther Bornkamm: Paulus. Anm. av Per Block Oscar Cullmann: Jesus och hans tids revolutionärer. Anm. av Per Block Anders Nygren: Tro och vetande. Religionsfilosofiska och teologiska essayer. Anm. av Joh. Lindblom Charles W. Kegley (red.): The Philosophy and Theology of Anders Nygren. Anm. av Johs. Horstmann Per Frostin: Politik och hermeneutik. En systematisk studie i Rudolf Bultmanns teologi med särskild hänsyn till hans luthertolkning. Anm. av Kjell Ove Nilsson Konrad Ameln, Christhard Mahrenholz & Karl Ferdinand Müller (red.): Jahrbuch für Liturgik und Hymnologie. Band 14, 1969. Anm. av Allan Arvastson Knud Ottosen (red.): The Manual from Notmark. Anm. av Bengt Strömberg Översikt över svensk teologisk litteratur under år 1970 AKTUELLT Per Erik Persson: ”Evangeliet och kyrkan”. Fyra års samtal mellan katoliker och lutheraner Lars Österlin: Den anglo-skandinaviska konferensen Holsten Fagerberg: Den fjärde internationella kongressen för lutherforskning Göran Bexell: ”Humanum”. Aktuellt ekumeniskt studium
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.384 | 0.233 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".