Bibliographic record
Abstract
ARTIKLAR Gerhard Pedersen: Den kristne prædikens egenart Edvin Larsson: Predikan i exegetisk och dogmatisk kontext HOMILETIK OCH FÖRRKUNNELSE Holsten Fagerberg: Predikans varför och hur Per Angvén: Homiletiken och kyrkans uppgift LITTERATUR Rudolf Bohren: Predigtlehre. 4. uppl. Werner Schütz: Probleme der Predigt. Reginald H. Fuller: The Use of the Bible in Preaching. George R. Fitzgerald: A Practical Guide to Preaching. Anm. av Martin Lind Victor Maag: Hiob. Wandlung und Verarbeitung des Problems in Novelle, Dialogdichtung und Spätfassung. Anm. av Tryggve N. D. Mettinger Otto Bauernfeind: Kommentar und Studien zur Apostelgeschichte. Anm. av Evald Lövestam Jan Löfberg: Spiritual or human value? An Evaluation-Systematical Reconstruction and Analysis of the Preaching of Jesus in the Synoptical Gospels. Anm. av Urban Forell Hans Friedrich Geisser m.fl.: Weder Ketzer noch Heiliger. Luthers Bedeutung für den ökumenischen Dialog. Anm. av Vilmos Vajta Otto Hermann Pesch: Gerechtfertigt aus Glauben. Luthers Frage an die Kirche. Anm. av Vilmos Vajta Bugge Amundsen: Dåp og tradisjon. Dåpstro og dåpspraxis i noen Østfold-distrikter på 1700- og 1800-tallet. Anm. av Ingmar Brohed Lars Sverkström: Livet omkring döden. Irja Kilpeläinen: Till samma port. Anm. av Anders Olivius Steinar Imsen: Superintendenten. En studie i kirkepolitikk, kirkeadministrasjon og statsutvikling mellom reformasjonen og eneveldet. Anm. av Jan Arvid Hellström Curt Dahlgren: Maranata. En sociologisk studie av en sektrörelses uppkomst och utveckling. Anm. av Nils G. Holm Alf Härdelin (red.): Predikohistoriska perspektiv. Studier tillägnade Åke Andrén. Anm. av Rune Larsson AKTUELLT Per Erik Persson: Vancouver 1983 Bengt Hägglund: Sjätte internationella lutherforskarkongressen i Erfurt FRÅN REDAKTIONEN
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.571 | 0.443 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".