Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Watch Man (17 minutes), is an video and immersive multi-channel sound installation which uses new audio technologies developed by FeONIC to create a red luminous floor that resonates with sound across its entire surface. The Watch Man examines how individual memory refers to a traumatic set of collective memories over a lifetime period. Drawing on cognitive neuropsychologist Martin A. Conway’s theories of memory, through ongoing dialogue, the Watch Man explores the conflict between trauma memory and the need for a coherent ‘life story’ through the experience of an 80 year old watchmaker, who as a 19 year old British soldier experienced one of the most deeply affecting and shocking events in the Second World War. Illingworth, S., Conway, M. A., Albano, C., Bennett, J., Bode, S. (2011). The Watch Man, Balnakiel: works by Shona Illingworth. London: Film and Video Umbrella, was dedicated to Two of Illingworth's projects: The Watch Man and Balnakiel (2009). The Watch Man has been written about extensively in books, journals and media including a major case study in Bennett, J. (2012) Practical Aesthetics: Art, Affect and Events After 9/11, IB Tauris, London, and in Albano, C. (2012) Fear and Contemporary Art – two chapters featuring, ‘The Watch Man’ and ‘Bare Dust’, Reaktion Book and Albano, C. (2008) Uncanny: a dimension of contemporary art. ESSE arts and opinions, Fear 2 (62). pp. 4-11. The Watch Man was exhibited in solo installations at: Dilston Grove, London; Interaccess Electronic Media Arts Centre, Toronto with the International Images Festival of Film, Video and New Media and at the Wellcome Collection, London to coincide with their exhibition War and Medicine. It has recently been screened at the Museum of Modern Art Buenos Aires in a special screening of Illingworth’s films, 14 November 2014.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".