Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous avons participé au stage intitulé Langue, culture et société québécoises qui s’est déroulé à l’Université de Montréal, du 27 juillet au 14 août en 2009. Nous avons suivi, le matin, le cours de didactique qui nous a permis d’aborder les théories de base et de les mettre en pratique par des activités facilement utilisables dans notre classe de français. Nous avons eu 2 travaux à remettre avant la fin du stage, un travail individuel centré sur l’exploitation et l’application des documents authentiques et un autre, en équipe, concernant la présentation d’une activité utilisant l’approche coopérative. L’après-midi, le programme socio-culturel était prévu ： des conférences à propos de l’histoire et la situation actuelle du Québec, des visites guidées, l’observation d’ateliers des étudiants qui suivaient le cours intensif d’été à l’École de français. Cet article est donc le rapport détaillé de ce stage avec\ndes commentaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".