Bibliographic record
Abstract
JURASSIC-CETACEOUS BIOCHRONOLOGY and amp; BIOGEOGRAPHY OF NORTH AMERICA. Ed. by G. E. G. Westermann.- Geol. Assoc. Canada, Spec. Paper 27 315 pp. 1984. / The Andes: A Geological Review. By Werner Zeil.- Beiträge zur regionalen Geologie der Erde, Bd. 13, 260 pp., 150 Illustr., Gebrüder Brntraeger, Stuttgart, 1979. / ALMEIDA, F. F. M. de and amp; HASUI, Y. (1985): The Central Brazil Shield Reviewed.- Episodes, Vol. 8, No.1, pp, No. I, pp. 29-37, IUGS, Ottawa. / GEOLOGIE ET PALEOECOLOGIE DES RECIFS, (Edit. J. Geister and amp; R. Herb) 3éme Cycle en Sciences de la Terre, Institut de Géologie de I'Université de Berne, Suiza, 1984. / GEISTER, J. (1984): Recifs Pleistocenes de la mer des Caraibes: Aspects Geologiques et Paléoecologiques.- In Géologie et Paléoecologia des Recifs (Edit. J. Geister R. Herb). 3eme Cycle en Sciences de la Terre, Institut de Geologie de l'Universite de Berne, 34 p. 21 Figs. / GEODYNAMICS OF THE EASTERN PACIFIC REGION, CARIBBEAN AND SCOTIA ARCS.- R. Cabré, S. J., Edit. Geodynamics Ser., Vol. 9, pp. 1-170, American Geophysical Union-Geological Society of America, 1983. / RAMIREZ, J.E., DUQUE, CARO, H., GOBERNA, J.E. TOUSSAINT, J.F. (1983): Geodynamic Research in Colombia (1972-1979).- In Geodynamics of the Eastern Pacific Region, Caribean and Scotia Arcs (Edit. R. Cabre, S.J.), Geodyn. Ser., 9:41-62,4 Figs. / GEOLOGIA NORANDINA (Publicación de la Sociedad· Colombiana de Geología), No.8, 69 pp., Diciembre de 1983. Apartado Aéreo 4865, Bogotá, Colombia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.413 | 0.243 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".