Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jo ???s Pants is a full length play in three acts, representing the three waves of feminism. It \nis a farcical interquel to the beloved coming-of-age novel Little Women by Louisa May Alcott. The fact that Little Women had a sequel entitled Good Wives may be a footnote lost to history, as both parts are now published as one. However, Alcott was not keen on \nwriting a sequel, and never intended to marry off her title character, Jo. In this adaptation, Jo rebels against her destiny and rewrites her own narrative. In the Civil War era, she runs away on the ???Underground Railroad??? for emancipating women, and arrives at the first safe house in Boston in the 1970s. There she is exposed to feminist literature and consciousness-raising circles, but is expelled for her nonconforming behavior. Still following her true spirit, she hops on a train heading West and arrives in San Francisco, where she may legally marry a woman and do something truly splendid with her life. This is a play for five actors, and breaks ground with a transgender main character.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".