MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7004644326

Optimization of host species raiding preference relative to temperature and host defensive capability by the kidnapper ant Temnothorax americanus

2021· dissertation· en· W7004644326 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiological and pharmacological studies of plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHost (biology)BroodPreferenceParasitismPupa
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kidnapper ants raid host-species colonies, abscond with brood, and raise host workers that work for the kidnapper colony. Temnothorax americanus uses Temnothorax ambiguus, Temnothorax curvispinosus and Temnothorax longispinosus as hosts. In southern Ontario, T. curvispinosus colonies are absent, while free living T. ambiguus colonies occur in warm microhabitats and T. longispinosus colonies occupy cooler microhabitats, presumably achieving optimal performance in species typical microhabitat. In choice tests T. americanus preferentially selects pupae of the host species whose temperature optimum is opposite to the temperature conditions of the T. americanus colony, possibly reflecting a preference to retrieve the least well defended host species relative to temperature. I tested whether that temperature dependent pupal retrieval preference extends to raiding preference for whole colonies and whether the defensive capability of T. ambiguus and T. longispinosus against T. americanus raids depends on temperature. I acclimatized T. americanus colonies and their hosts to 25°C or 15°C in controlled environment chambers and offered simultaneous choices of standardized nests of the two host species to assess any effect of temperature on host species raiding preference. I also allowed T. americanus to raid each host species within either temperature and recorded the numbers of host species casualties, kidnapper casualties, salvaged brood and captured brood, and the length of raids to assess any effects of temperature and species on defensive capability. I also tested for associations between kidnapper colony composition and raiding success. There was no effect of temperature or host species on raiding preference or host defensive capability, suggesting that host species are raided without preference and are equally well defended regardless of temperature. Recent prior raiding experience did increase kidnapper ant success in raids and larger T. americanus colonies captured more brood. Defensive capability does not appear to drive the documented temperature-dependent pupal retrieval preference. It is possible that temperature instead influences the volatility of the cuticular-hydrocarbon profiles of the pupae of the host species differentially, thus affecting the attractiveness of the pupae to kidnapper colony members, though future work is needed to determine exactly what drives this temperature dependent pupal retrieval preference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicBiological and pharmacological studies of plants→French-language works237,207→