MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7004757197

Oxygen uptake and vertical transport during deep convection events in the Labrador Sea and its interannual variability

2020· dissertation· en· W7004757197 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOxygenConvectionBiogeochemical cycleAtmosphere (unit)Deep convectionDeep seaFlux (metallurgy)DisequilibriumBottom water
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dissolved oxygen (DO) is essential for marine life and biogeochemical cycling.\nTo a first order approximation, DO is determined by the competition between ocean ventilation and biological productivity. \nApproximately 21% of the atmospheric gases is oxygen, and the waters at the ocean surface are enriched in oxygen. \nVentilation occurs through a suite of physical processes that brings the DO-rich surface waters into the interior ocean. \nThis dissertation combines two works that closely examine the ventilation of oxygen in the region of deep water formation, and explore the relationship between air-sea oxygen flux and surface forcing aiming at deepening our understanding of the processes that regulate he DO inventory. \nThrough these analyses we develop a framework to understand the oxygen to ocean heat content (O2-OHC) ratio in the ocean interior. \nBoth works focus on the Labrador Sea and include a theoretical development and its validation using a suite of numerical sensitivity experiments. \n\nThe first work leads to two main conclusions.\n1) Both the duration and the intensity of the winter-time cooling are important to the total O2 uptake for a convective event. \nStronger cooling leads to deeper convection and brings oxygen into deeper depths. \nLonger duration of the cooling period increases the total amount of oxygen uptake over the convective season. \n2) The bubble-mediated influx of oxygen can increase oxygen uptake, but part of the contribution is compensated by the weakening the diffusive influx because the air-sea disequilibrium of oxygen is shifted towards supersaturation. \nThe degree of compensation between the diffusive and bubble-mediated gas exchange depends on the relative strength of oceanic vertical mixing and the gas transfer velocity. \nStrong convective mixing reduces the degree of compensation so that the two components of gas exchange together drive exceptionally strong oceanic oxygen uptake. \nA numerical model with idealized domain and non-hydrostatic dynamics is used to test the hypotheses in this work. \n\nThe second work explores what controls the O2-OHC ratio during deep convection. \nModels of different complexities ranging from 1-D convective adjustment model to a regional ocean circulation model that includes a complex biogeochemical module are used.\nThe bubble injection increases the oxygen flux and the magnitude of the O2-OHC ratio under intense convective events. \nLonger cooling duration leads to a larger magnitude of the O2-OHC ratio. \nThe pre-conditioning of the vertical gradients in oxygen and temperature are important for the O2-OHC ratio under different climate scenarios. \n\nWith these two works, we highlight a few key mechanisms that are important to regulate the DO inventory in the ocean interior, but further efforts are needed to understand the global DO variability and to constrain the deoxygenation potential under a warming climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it