MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7004757758

O cotidiano das interações humano-lixo no assentamento Boa Esperança-lagoa da Manga em Aracatiaçu, Sobral-Ceará

2012· article· en· W7004757758 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomological Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingInterpretation (philosophy)Active listeningDirtSettlement (finance)SeclusionGarbageWhite (mutation)Order (exchange)MetisSafeguarding
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation had as main objective to reveal the daily life of human interactions trash in the settlement Boa Esperança - Lagoa da Manga, in order to understand the historical, emotional, social, cultural and training that are embedded in the daily practices of care that settlers lay with the public space and "trash." For this, we opted for a qualitative research, inspired by ethnography, that by observing the spot, listening to the other, describing the habits and customs and at the same time, the interpretation of the multiple aspects involved in practices, three discourse markers of place, with the trash home. Came to a view that the settlers expressed a feeling of intrinsic loveliness by the place where he lives and the people with whom they live, as revealed through the enhancement of historic struggles and achievements of its people, as well as the feeling of belonging and umbilicus buried the land. Also, consider just dirt (feces and uneaten food) as garbage, unlike the concept of junk to the academic realm. The feces and food scraps are reused, respectively, for compost earth food supplementation and domestic animals. This is the representational matrix that organizes socio-cultural influences and the daily practices of the settlers as the actual garbage produced, even the junk such as sacks and bags, paper, bottles etc. not servive at the time, or are put in the pantry, or reused in daily activities of the field, which shows a management junk in your own home, the woman is the manager of it and responsible for the cleanliness of public spaces through the practice of sweeping that is passed from mothers to daughters and starts at home, going to the yard and extends to public spaces, becoming a space-socio-cultural affective informal education. However, this area of teaching cultural traditions of care and environmental cleanup against the "garbage" is being threatened because women are moving away gradually sweeping activities, considering that the time available for this practice is being reduced and replaced by employment in the cooperative brown, newly installed in the settlement. Therefore, it is necessary at this time a do-teaching environment that promotes the knowledge and practices historical, socio-cultural and training of the settlers against the "garbage" lined on affection for the place, in order to mitigate the lifestyles subalternizantes seeking to make the rural man a mere player colonializantes practices, typical of the capitalist system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicEntomological Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207