MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7004875516

PENGARUH PSYCOEDUCATIVE FAMILY THERAPY TERHADAP PENGETAHUAN, DUKUNGAN KELUARGA DAN STIGMA KUSTA DENGAN MODEL PENDEKATAN CALGARY

2015· other· en· W7004875516 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversitas Airlangga Repository (Universitas Airlangga) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespondentNonprobability samplingWilcoxon signed-rank testLeprosyIntervention (counseling)Statistical significanceTest (biology)Mann–Whitney U test
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leprosy is a chronic infection of the skin and peripheral nerves caused by Mycobacterium leprae. Clients leprosy experience disability, skin, feet, hands and fingers due to the loss of protective sensation of pain. Skin lesions are progressive and permanent physical disability triggers physical and psychological isolation on the client leprosy. Client received a negative impression of leprosy last a lifetime even after the client is cured. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of intervention on knowledge psychoeducative family, family support and the stigma of leprosy with a model approach Calgary. The research design used in this study is quasy experiment with the prepost test control two group design. Sampling techniques manner with non random purposive sampling. The sample used was the respondent and the respondent's family number 60. Respondents were divided into two groups: the intervention and comparison groups, each group of 30 people. Capturing patient data using questionnaires filled out by the respondent and family. Analysis of the data used is Wilcoxon signed rank test and Whitney man with a significance level of0.005. Results demonstrate knowledge (a:0:0,05, p = 0.001), family support (a:0:0,05, p = 0.001) and self-stigma (a:0:0,05, p = 0.001) after psycoeducative family therapy in the intervention group , In the comparison group showed knowledge (a:0:0,05, p = 0.01), family support (a:0:0,05, p = 0.001) and self-stigma ( a:0:0,05, p = 0.07). Results of statistical tests comparing the control group and the intervention group that is knowledge (a:0:0,05, p = 0.000), family support (a:0:0,05, p = 0.000) and self-stigma (a:0:0,05, p = 0.004 ). It was concluded that there are significant family psychoeducative to knowledge, family support and self-stigma. The most significant influence of variables contained in the knowledge and support of the family. Some respondents and families who do not experience an increase in the level of knowledge, family support and the stigma (self-stigma) due to the characteristics of respondents and some characteristics of the family system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversitas Airlangga Repository (Universitas Airlangga)Same topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsFrench-language works237,207