PENGARUH PSYCOEDUCATIVE FAMILY THERAPY TERHADAP PENGETAHUAN, DUKUNGAN KELUARGA DAN STIGMA KUSTA DENGAN MODEL PENDEKATAN CALGARY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leprosy is a chronic infection of the skin and peripheral nerves caused by Mycobacterium leprae. Clients leprosy experience disability, skin, feet, hands and fingers due to the loss of protective sensation of pain. Skin lesions are progressive and permanent physical disability triggers physical and psychological isolation on the client leprosy. Client received a negative impression of leprosy last a lifetime even after the client is cured. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of intervention on knowledge psychoeducative family, family support and the stigma of leprosy with a model approach Calgary. The research design used in this study is quasy experiment with the prepost test control two group design. Sampling techniques manner with non random purposive sampling. The sample used was the respondent and the respondent's family number 60. Respondents were divided into two groups: the intervention and comparison groups, each group of 30 people. Capturing patient data using questionnaires filled out by the respondent and family. Analysis of the data used is Wilcoxon signed rank test and Whitney man with a significance level of0.005. Results demonstrate knowledge (a:0:0,05, p = 0.001), family support (a:0:0,05, p = 0.001) and self-stigma (a:0:0,05, p = 0.001) after psycoeducative family therapy in the intervention group , In the comparison group showed knowledge (a:0:0,05, p = 0.01), family support (a:0:0,05, p = 0.001) and self-stigma ( a:0:0,05, p = 0.07). Results of statistical tests comparing the control group and the intervention group that is knowledge (a:0:0,05, p = 0.000), family support (a:0:0,05, p = 0.000) and self-stigma (a:0:0,05, p = 0.004 ). It was concluded that there are significant family psychoeducative to knowledge, family support and self-stigma. The most significant influence of variables contained in the knowledge and support of the family. Some respondents and families who do not experience an increase in the level of knowledge, family support and the stigma (self-stigma) due to the characteristics of respondents and some characteristics of the family system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".