Osgoode’s 2013 Constitutional Cases Conference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osgoode’s 2014 Constitutional Cases Conference\n18th Annual Analysis of Supreme Court of Canada’s Constitutional Decisions\nTORONTO, April 6, 2015 – Osgoode Hall Law School’s highly anticipated Constitutional Cases Conference, examining constitutional decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada from 2014, will take place on Friday, April 10, 2015 from 8.30 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the InterContinental Hotel Toronto Yorkville, 220 Bloor Street West. Members of the media are cordially invited to attend this sold-out conference. Please advise Virginia Corner (below) if you are planning to attend, as space will be limited.\nThe opening address at 9.30 a.m. by Osgoode Professor Jamie Cameron will provide a review of the Supreme Court’s 2014 constitutional jurisprudence, highlighting key patterns and trends and commenting on significant developments.\nA who’s who of Canadian legal scholars and practitioners will participate in the following panel discussions throughout the day:\n10 a.m. Indigenous Peoples and the Constitution\n11.30 a.m. Panel A: Contesting the Constitution Act, 1867\nPanel B: Prisons and Punishment\n1.30 p.m. A Conversation with Supreme Court of Canada Justice Rosalie Abella\n2.15 p.m. Panel C: Fundamental Freedoms\nPanel D: Mr. Big and Big Brother: Developments in Police Powers\n3.45 p.m. The Slow Burn of Constitutional Justice/Constitutional Justice in the Longue Durée\nThe conversation at 1.30 p.m. with Justice Rosalie Abella will be hosted by Osgoode Dean Lorne Sossin.\nComplete details of the 2014 Constitutional Cases Conference, which is co-chaired by Osgoode Professors Benjamin Berger and Sonia Lawrence, can be found here.\nWHAT: Osgoode’s 2014 Constitutional Cases Conference\nWHEN: Friday, April 10, 2015, 8.30 a.m. to 5 p.m.\nWHERE: InterContinental Hotel Toronto Yorkville, 220 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON M5S 1T8\n-30-\nYork University is helping to shape the global thinkers and thinking that will define tomorrow. York U’s unwavering commitment to excellence reflects a rich diversity of perspectives and a strong sense of social responsibility that sets us apart. A York U degree empowers graduates to thrive in the world and achieve their life goals through a rigorous academic foundation balanced by real-world experiential education. As a globally recognized research centre, York U is fully engaged in the critical discussions that lead to innovative solutions to the most pressing local and global social challenges. York U’s 11 faculties and 27 research centres are thinking bigger, broader and more globally, partnering with 288 leading universities worldwide. York U’s community is strong − 55,000 students, 7,000 faculty and staff, and more than 275,000 alumni.\nMedia Contact:\nVirginia Corner, Communications Manager, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, 416-736-5820, vcorner@osgoode.yorku.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".