MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7004992758

Peter Comestor’s Lectures on the Gospel of Luke and its Glosses (c. 1163-8): A Partial Critical Edition and Study

2022· dissertation· W7004992758 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CambridgePembroke College, University of CambridgeEuropean Science FoundationUniversity of Notre DameUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of OxfordUniversity College, OxfordInternational Society for Infectious Diseases
KeywordsGospelExposition (narrative)ScholarshipMiddle AgesOrder (exchange)GrammarMedieval studiesThe arts
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation studies the Latin biblical lectures of Peter Comestor — a Paris-based scholar who lived and taught in the middle of the twelfth century — through the preparation of a critical edition of his lectures on the Gospel of Luke. Comestor’s corpus of writings formed part of a larger tradition of twelfth-century Latin biblical commentaries that were composed in the cathedral schools of Laon and Paris from roughly 1100 until the University of Paris superseded them around 1215. In recent decades, recognition that the medieval study of the liberal arts and sacred scriptures shared much in terms of didactic approach has led scholarship to revisit a once- common distinction made by modern historians between biblical commentaries and systematic, theological treatises. Emerging research has begun to emphasize the importance of the liberal arts for understanding medieval theology, in whatever literary form, in terms of the generic expectations of classical philology. In order to bolster these efforts to recontextualize the study of the Bible within the broader educational programs of the Latin Middle Ages, I explore Peter Comestor’s lectures on the Gospel of Luke according to one of the informative structures of education that provided continuity across medieval northern France: the methods of literary exposition originally taught in the Roman grammar schools and handed on throughout the Middle Ages in the ‘liberal’ study of the ars grammatica (the art of grammar).My study of Comestor’s Luke lectures, which is enabled by my preliminary work editing the manuscripts containing the writings of Comestor and some of his contemporaries, demonstrates how the lecturers at the cathedral schools of northern France conceived of Christian theology, especially biblical exegesis, as a work of textual criticism. The fact that this scholarly endeavor had as its object the totality of all intelligible reality thus afforded the exegete the right to use the biblical text as an opportunity to teach everything from geometry to canon law. Thus, my research illustrates how liberal arts pedagogies in turn influenced scholars’ conception of Christian theology as sacra pagina (philological exegesis of the Bible) in the decades before the advent of the first European universities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicCell Image Analysis Techniques→French-language works237,207→