PENGARUH TINGKAT INFLASI DAN SEKTOR KEUANGAN SYARIAH TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI INDONESIA PERIODE 2011Q1-2022Q4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out and prove whether inflation and the Islamic financial sector have a relationship and influence economic growth. This study discusses and examines the effect of the inflation rate and the Islamic financial sector on Indonesia's economic growth for the period 2011 quarter 1 to 2022 quarter 4. The data used in this research is secondary data which is time series data. This study uses a quantitative approach using multiple linear regression analysis techniques assisted by the Eviews 9 program. The variables used are Gross Domestic Product, Inflation, Jakarta Islamic Index (JII), and sukuk. The results of this study indicate that the inflation variable has no significant effect on economic growth in Indonesia. The sharia stock variable (JII) has a positive and significant effect on economic growth in Indonesia. The sukuk variable has a positive and significant effect on economic growth in Indonesia. Simultaneously, the inflation variable, the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) and sukuk have a positive and significant effect on economic growth in Indonesia for the period 2011 quarter 1 to 2022 quarter 4.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".