PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KETENAGAKERJAAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under the Criminal Procedure Code, the investigation is investigating a series of actions to find and collect evidence with the evidence that makes light of an offense that occurred in order to find the suspect (Article 1 point to 2 Criminal Procedure Code). The investigators referred to as such, according to the Criminal Procedure Code in Article 6 was an official of the Republic of Indonesia State Police (INP) and officials of certain civil servants who were given special authority by law (Civil). Labor sector, the government through the Ontario Ministry of Labor has established investigators civil servants (Civil) specifically authorized by Act of the Act. No. 3 of 1951 regarding the Statement of Applicability of Labour Control Act 1948 nr. 23 From the Republic of Indonesia for the whole of Indonesia, to conduct criminal investigations against Labor in discharging its duties under the coordination and supervision of police investigators. This is as stipulated in Article 7 paragraph (2) Criminal Procedure Code. Growth field, there is a difference of interpretation between the actors of industrial relations to the word coordination in Article 7 paragraph (2) conditions, the employers and the government, for example, interpreted the word coordination is only limited coordination between the ordinary civil servant investigators with police investigators in conducting employment criminal investigation, does not mean that the police authority to conduct their own investigation. While working party considers that such coordination also means that police investigators are also authorized to conduct criminal investigations against labor, because as the coordinator of the Civil National Police, and this has been proven that the police always receive when there are party workers who reported the crime employment. Become a problem then is if it is true that police investigators are also authorized to conduct an investigation of any criminal proceedings labor, then how about the existence of the Labor PPNS given special authority by the labor laws as the Civil? This study answered these problems through research, normative law, and the analysis used in this study is to interpretation. Such analysis was done by systematically through the stages of primary law materials and secondary legal materials. From these measures are intended to make an interpretation as a basis to take the next step in the form of conclusions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".