Perfil psicosocial de un grupo de pacientes sobrevivientes de cáncer de mama
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar las características psicosociales de un grupo de pa-cientes sobrevivientes de CaMa. Mediante un muestreo no probabilístico, por conveniencia, participaron diecisiete mujeres pertenecientes al Grupo de Sobrevivientes de Cáncer de Mama “Ave Fénix”, del CMN “20 de Noviembre”, ISSSTE. Se realizó una investigación no experi-mental, con diseño transversal exploratorio. Las pacientes respondieron el Cuestionario de Regulación Emocional, la Escala de Ansiedad y Depresión Hospitalaria y la Escala de Toronto de Alexitimia, durante una de las sesiones mensuales que sostiene el grupo. Los resultados sugieren que el grupo presenta un nivel alto de alexitimia, un nivel leve de ansiedad y poca de-presión; además, utilizan la reevaluación cognitiva como estrategia regulación emocional. Estas características dan lugar a intervenciones psicosociales de grupo en su hospital
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".