MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005269506

Primo VE Troubleshooting: Is it Primo? Is Alma? Is it something else?

2019· article· en· W7005269506 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Analysis with R
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTroubleshootingSimplicitysortAsideSketchSession (web analytics)StaringSubject (documents)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hear from Primo VE sites all round the world to learn their top tips for troubleshooting Primo VE issues. Sometimes it is tricky to figure out whether the problem is arising in Alma, or is it something you have configured in Primo VE? Sometimes it’s just a plain thorny problem to sort out even if you know where to go. We all need a little help sometimes. If your Library is new to Primo VE, then this session may be especially helpful for you. In a series of lightning talks each presenter will: (1) Describe a problem or two they encountered in Primo VE, (2) Explain how they tracked down the cause, (3) Reveal the outcome. Troubleshooting stories cover integrations, FRBR and Dedup processes, local fields, custom search boxes and working with external data sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)Same topicData Analysis with RFrench-language works237,207