Promoting healthy habits among children in a residential facility.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Childhood obesity has been a significant public health concern in the United States. The prevalence of obesity among children and adolescents has increased over the past few decades. There are serious implications for immediate and long-term health. It poses serious health risks and economic challenges. Setting: This quality improvement project will take place at a residential psychiatric treatment facility and therapeutic foster care program for children and adolescents with mental health or behavioral issues. This facility is in the suburbs of Louisville, Kentucky. Purpose: The purpose of this project is to boost physical activity and improve knowledge about nutrition and physical activity for children residing in a treatment facility. Procedures: Procedures: This quality improvement project will consist of an 8-week intervention that focuses on physical activity and nutrition education. There will be two 45-minute sessions a week with one focusing on physical activity and one focusing on nutrition. The sessions will consist of 15 minutes of education and 30 minutes dedicated to experimental learning. Measures: The Kids Activity and Knowledge Questionnaire (KAN-Q) and the Modified Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy 2 (CAPL-2) were used to evaluate physical activity time, physical activity knowledge, and nutritional knowledge for this quality improvement project.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".