MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7005327847

President's Message Part Two

2024· article· en· W7005327847 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Identification (biology)Feature (linguistics)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

~-dent' Mes s age, con t inued t hat is g oin~ into effect Sept. 27, and will be published in the Fed e r al R egister~ ••• "The Canadian Wildlife service has sent the RE V 1SION of the Bird Banding Manual, Vol. 1 to the printer."*U RGEN T: Sou r ce of Canary Feath er s needed fo~ extract.R.W. Covert, Vice President, Holl t ste r-S t ie r Laborator1 es, 550 Indust r ial Drive , Ye adon, Pa.19050, make r s of In s ect St in g e xtra~t , wri tes for EBBA assista nce in loc a ti hg Ca nary Breed ers who mlgh t s uppl y feat he rs fro m whi ch t o make extrac t s .Th i s r equ es t developed out of a n exc ha nge of cor r esp onden ce i n whi c h I tri ed t o deter mi ne wh y a paste of Mea t Tend e ri zer see ms to r educ e t he eff ect of Bee Sti ng.I t was used qui te effe c t iv e l y a t Boy Sc out Jambo.r ee-West i n I da ho in 1973 .I would cautio n Ba nd ers that s tatistics show that t he a ll ergic r eactio n of i nsec t bi te of bee sting is far f110I"e da ngero us t o ma ny i ud1Y idua l s t han poi sonou s s nake bite in t he U.S .(Wh a t t o do about Bit es & Sti n9s of Ve no- mo us Ani ma l s .R.E.Ar nol d, M. D., Collie r Boo ks, N.Y.C.) •. Through the combined cooperation of the Banding Lab and New Mex1c~ Fish and Wildlife Service, your President served as Workshop 1nstructor where the technique of Birdbanding was demonstwated as as part of Wildlife Management at the 137,000 acre Philmont Scout Ranch and Training Center, Cimmaron, N.M., in early July.The actual focus of our workshops was the introduction of metrics, OBIS, and old Scouting Skills.But---after 50 hours of net time with a 5-meter mist net .. .four HY , Black-billed Magpies were CAUGHT BY HAND and banded.Banding at 6,800 feet in the "high country" of New Mexico is a cons i derable challenge.One of my Advisors in the two weeks of workshops and the banding venture was Walt Wenzel, Conservation Exec.-NationalB.S.A.Besides having served as Ranch Biologist for six years, he has the "eyes" of an Eagle when it comes to spotting wildlife.We hope to "follow-up" on this effort with an Ecology-Conservation Workshop which will be conducted by B.S.A. mid-July 1976, at Philmont Ranch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0090.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2830.188

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)→Same topicCell Image Analysis Techniques→French-language works237,207→