MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005360107

Prematüre ve zamanında doğan bebeklerde gövde kontrolünün incelenmesi

2014· other· tr· W7005360107 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMarmara University Open Access System · 2014
Typeother
Languagetr
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFull TermElectrodiagnosisMotor activityTrunk
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kutlutürk S. Prematüre ve Zamanında Doğan Bebeklerde Gövde Kontrolünün İncelenmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Programı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul, 2014 (Danışman: Prof. Dr. S. Ufuk Yurdalan). \n\nAmaç: Son yıllarda perinatal ve neonatal tıbbi bakımdaki ilerlemeler, prematüre bebeklerin hayatta kalım oranlarını arttırmakla birlikte nörogelişimsel problemlerin de artışını beraberinde getirmiştir. Bu nedenle çalışmamızda, prematüre bebeklerde nörogelişimsel özellikleri saptamak ve uygun tedavi yaklaşımlarını uygulamak amacıyla, zamanında doğan bebeklere göre prematüre bebeklerin kaba motor performansları ile gövde kontrolleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek hedeflendi. \nGereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma, Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü’nde gerçekleştirilmiş olup, araştırmaya katılma kriterlerini taşıyan 42 prematüre ve 43 zamanında doğan bebek dahil edildi. Değerlendirmeler Alberta İnfant Motor Skalası (AİMS) ve Segmental Değerlendirmeli Gövde Kontrol Skalası (SDGKS) ile gerçekleştirildi. \nBulgular: Prematüre bebeklerin % 26.2’sinin, term bebeklerin ise % 9.3’ünün atipik gelişim gösterdiği saptandı. Gruplar arası segmental gövde kontrol düzeyleri karşılaştırıldığında anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p>0.05). Olguların kaba motor performansları ile segmental gövde kontrol düzeyleri arasında istatistiki olarak pozitif yönde kuvvetli bir ilişki bulundu (p<0.05). Normal gelişen prematürlere göre atipik gelişen prematürlerin segmental gövde kontrol düzeylerinin farklı olduğu belirlendi (p<0.05). Zamanında doğan bebeklerin AİMS total skor kategorileri ile segmental gövde kontrol düzeyleri arasında anlamlı fark yoktu (p>0.05). Sonuçlar: Çalışmamızda, nörolojik probleme sahip olmayan ancak atipik gelişim gösteren prematüre bebeklerin gövde kontrollerinin, normal gelişim gösteren prematüre bebeklere göre yetersiz olduğu ve erken müdahale kapsamında gövde kontrolü problemine özgü fizyoterapi yaklaşımlarının uygulanması gerektiği sonucuna ulaşıldı. \n\nAnahtar Sözcükler: Erken müdahale, fizyoterapi, postür, prematüre, prematüre gövde kontrolü. \n\n\nSUMMARY\n\nKutlutürk S. Asessment of Trunk Control of Premature and Full-Term Infants. Marmara University. Institute of Health Science, Master of Science Thesis in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul, 2014 (Advisor: Prof. Dr. S. Ufuk Yurdalan).\n\nPurpose: The recent advances in both perinatal and neonatal medical care have improved the survival rate of premature infants while also causing an increase in the associated neurodevelopmental problems. In this thesis, we present a comparative study of the rough motor performance and trunk control in full-term and pre-term infants with the goal of identify neurodevelopment skills in pre-term infants and find out the best possible therapeutical approach. \nMethod: The study had been carried out at Marmara University, Faculty of Health Science, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department. 42 pre-term infants and 43 full-term infants have inclusion criterias were included in our study. We used Alberta Infant Motor Scale and Segmental Assesment of Trunk Control Scale are for the evaluation. \nResults: The premature infant group showed 26,2% atypical development and the full-term infant group showed 9,3% atypical development. There was no statistically significant difference between the segmental trunk control of both group (p>0,05). Rough motor performance and segmental trunk control levels of the two groups showed positive correlation (p<0,05). There was a meaningful difference in the segmental trunk control levels of atypically developing and normal performanced premature infants (p<0,05). There was no difference in total scoring catogaries of AIMS and segmental trunk conrol levels of full-term infants (p>0,05)\nConclusions: In our study, we concluded that the trunk control of the atypicalla developing premature infants with no neurological problems was not efficient when compared to the normally developing premature infants, and applications of physiotherapical approach based on trunk control problems should be considered within early intervention. \n\nKey Words: Early intervention, physical therapy, posture, premature, premature trunk control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesOpen science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0160.009
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it