MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005385157

Reaction Kinetics at Very Low Temperatures Measured Using a Pulsed Laval Nozzle System

2007· other· en· W7005385157 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleAnalytical Chemistry (journal)AcetyleneStagnation pressureKinetic energyChemical kineticsRotational temperatureRocket engine nozzleCombustionChemical reaction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pulsed Laval nozzle apparatus for the study of the 'kinetics of reactions at low temperatures has been designed, built and characterised. The System makes use of a convergent-divergent shaped Laval nozzle, which results in cooling of the gas flow, do~ , to 70 K. The experimental setup includes a, main chamber in which two pulsed solenoid valves deliver gas to a pre-expansion reservoir from where the gas flows through the Laval nozzle and out into the low pressure regime in the main chamber. For kinetic studies, a pulsed laser photolysis ~ laser induced fluorescence method was used to measure rate coefficients of reactions ofOH at 86 ± 7 K and 69 ± 6 K, with tertiary butyl hydroperoxide (t-BuOOH) used as an OH precursor when required. The Laval nozzles were characterised using two methods; impact pressure measurements and rotational spectroscopy, the temperature measurements from both of which agreed within error. Measurements of rate coefficients for collisional quencQing ofNO (A2L+, v'= 0) by O2 and NO and OH (A2L+, v' = 0) by O2 and N2, were found to agree well with predictions from previpus experimental data and a model containing contributions from the multipole attractive forces model and Harpoon mechanism. Measurements of rate coeffic~ents for reactions of OH with ethene (k1), propyne (k2), acetylene (k3) and benzene (k4) were also carried out. The rate coefficients for these reactions' were found to be k1 = (2.12 ± 0.12) x 10-11 and (3.22 ± 0.46) x 10-11 cm3 molecule-1 set, at 86 K and 69 K, respectively, k2 = (3.11 ± 0.09) x 10-12, (5.02 ± 0.11) x 10-12 and (5.08 ± 0.65) x 10-12 cm3 molecule-1S-l, at 298 K, 86 K and 69 K, respectively, and the upper limit for k3 was assigned to be < 2.4 x 10-12 cm3 molecule-1S-l at 69 K, 14 was unable to be measured due to interference from the benzene sensitized decomposition of the t-BuOOH OH precursor. Reactions of the acetyl radical with O2 (ks) and OH with acetone (k<,) and methyl ethyl ketone, MEK (k7), were also studied, with ks = (5.87 ± 0.39) x 10,12 and (9.21 ± 1.24) x 10-12 cm3 molecule-1 S'l at 86 K and 69 K, respectively. Measurements of the rate coefficients of k<, and k7 were carried out using two different OH sources; reaction of the acetyl radical with O2 and photolysis of t-BuOOH. Curved bimolecular plots, observed mainly at 69 K, indicated formation of acetone and MEK dimers as well as clusters with t-BuOOH. Lower limits of rate coefficients, when acetyl + O2 was used as the OH source, were measured as k<, = (5.67.± 0.32) x 10-11 and (3.29 ±0.59) x 10-11 cm3 molecule-l s-t, k7 = (8.01 ± 1.17) x 10-11 and (5.59 ±0.83) x 10-11 cm3 molecule-l S-l at 86 K and 69 K, respectively, these showed a large incre~se in the rate coefficient from the reported room temperature values and both rate coefficients agreed well with those measUred with t-BuOOH as the OH precursor. However, calculations to determine the effect and extent of clustering in the system indicate that the actual value of the rate coefficient for k<, at 69 K could be up to 85% highe.~ than the value reported here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207