Prenatal maternal stress and infant development as assessed by maturity of play behavior: a QF2011 Queensland flood study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A. Appendix 1: Questions used to Assess the Four Dimensions (Threat, Loss, Scope and Change) of the Objective Stress Questionnaire that the Mothers completed after the Ice Storm……………………………………………………………....153 B. Appendix 2: Toys with the 36 Adult Classified Appropriate Uses, and Order of their Placement (from the Infant's left in a Semi Circle) in the Testing Room…………………………………………………………………………....155 C. Appendix 3: Heirarchical Regression Analyses of All PNMS Variables including Covariates in the Model………………………………………………………...156 PRENATAL MATERNAL STRESS AND INFANT DEVELOPMENT List of Figures 1. Interaction between Mothers' Objective Hardship and Timing of Exposure in Predicting Stereotypical Plat at 16 Months…………………………………………...67 2. Interaction between Mothers' Cognitive Appraisal and Timing of Exposure in Predicting Stereotypical Play at 16 Months…………………………………………...71 3. Interaction between Mothers' Cognitive Appraisal and Timing of Exposure in Predicting Relational Play at 16 Months……………………………………………..77 4. Interaction between Mothers' Objective Hardship and Timing of Exposure in Predicting Displayed Hypotheses at 16 Months……………………………………...86 5. Interaction between Mothers' Cognitive Appraisal and Timing of Exposure on Displayed Hypotheses at 30 Months……………………………………………….109
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".