Qualidade, Espiritualidade e Autocriticismo em Pessoas Idosas sob Resposta Social do Concelho de Cantanhede: estudo exploratório
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta investigação teve como principal objetivo perceber a relação entre a qualidade de vida, bem-estar espiritual e autocriticismo em pessoas idosas que frequentam os Centros de Dia (CD) e as Estruturas Residenciais Para Pessoas Idosas (ERPI) no concelho de Cantanhede. O estudo envolveu seis instituições do concelho de Cantanhede e teve a participação de 138 pessoas idosas (84 em CD e 54 em ERPI). O sexo mais prevalente foi o feminino, quer na resposta social de CD (70,2%), quer em ERPI (77,8%), com idades compreendidas entre os 76 e os 85 anos em ambas as respostas sociais [CD (M = 81,36); ERPI (M = 82,69)]. O protocolo de investigação incluiu os seguintes instrumentos: Questionário Sociodemográfico; Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-Bref); Questionário de Bem-estar Espiritual (QBEE) e Escala das Formas do Autocriticismo e Autotranquilização (FSCRS). Os principais resultados do estudo mostram-nos que os participantes com escolaridade, os que ingressaram na instituição por iniciativa própria e os que consideram o seu estado de saúde “moderado e bom” apresentam maiores níveis de qualidade de vida e de bem-estar espiritual. Os sujeitos com maiores níveis de autocriticismo são os que se encontram em ERPI e os que frequentam a resposta social por falta de apoio familiar, perda do cônjuge ou de autonomia. Os dados obtidos demonstram que a qualidade de vida se relaciona positivamente com o bem-estar espiritual, com a subescala Eu Tranquilizador da FSCRS, com uma melhor perceção do estado de saúde e negativamente com o autocriticismo (Eu Detestado). O bem-estar espiritual relaciona-se positivamente com a subescala Eu Tranquilizador e negativamente com a subescala Eu Detestado da FSCRS. A subescala Eu Tranquilizador associa-se positivamente com a perceção do estado de saúde. Conclui-se que existem associações entre a qualidade de vida, o bem-estar espiritual, o autocriticismo/autotranquilização e a perceção do estado de saúde. Os participantes com maiores níveis de bem-estar espiritual lidam melhor com os desafios, apresentando uma maior capacidade de autotranquilização e uma melhor perceção de saúde. / The main objective of this investigation was to understand the relationship between quality of life, spiritual well-being and self-criticism in elderly people who attend Day Centers (DC) and Residential Structures for Elderly People (ERPI) in the municipality of Cantanhede. The study involved six institutions in the municipality of Cantanhede and had the participation of 138 elderly people (84 in DC and 54 in ERPI). The most prevalent sex was female, either in the social response of DC (70,2%), or in ERPI (77,8%), with aged between 76 and 85 years in both social responses [DC (M = 81,36); ERPI (M = 82,69)]. The investigation protocol included the following instruments: Sociodemographic Questionnaire; Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-Bref); Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire (QBEE) and Forms of Self-Criticism and Self-Reassurance Scale (FSCRS). The main results of the study show that participants with education, those who joined the institution on their own initiative and those who consider their health status “moderate and good” have higher levels of quality of life and spiritual well-being. The subjects with the highest levels of self-criticism are those who are in ERPI and those who attend the social response due to lack of family support, loss of spouse or autonomy. The data obtained explain that the quality of life is positively related to spiritual well-being, with the subscale Reassure Self, with a better perception of health status and negatively with self-criticism (Hated Self). Spiritual well-being is positively related to the Reassuring Self subscale and negatively related to the Hated Self subscale. The Reassuring Self subscale is positively associated with perceived health status. It is concluded that there are associations between quality of life, spiritual well-being, self-criticism/self-reassurance and the perception of health. Participants with higher levels of spiritual well-being deal better with challenges, showing a greater ability to calm themselves, and a better perception of health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".