The relationship between host government contracts for oil and gas activities and public participation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter analyzes how certain Arctic states engage with public participation in the negotiation and implementation of host government contracts within the oil and gas industry. It provides an overview of public participation in general and analyses in detail the special conditions and challenges of operations in the Arctic. The extensive extraction of hydrocarbons has caused a significant decrease in conventional reserves within easily accessible areas. The chapter also analyses public participation in host state contracts in two Arctic countries, namely Norway and Canada. Both countries possess a developed petroleum regime and have expressed active interest in exploring the resources of the Arctic; they also have extensive legal provisions regarding public participation. The environmental groups sued the government but the district court of Oslo dismissed the case in early 2018. The analysis of host government contracts of Norway and Canada within the oil and gas sector demonstrates various main points.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it