âRecreation as Re-creation?â: Analyzing how Aboriginal studentsâ experienced and reported their recreation within two Canadian residential schools
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This exploratory study examines how Aboriginal students experienced recreation within two Canadian residential schools.Using archival research and a qualitative, thematic analysis approach, two schools' student publications, The Mount Elgin Sputnik and The Wigwam News, dated from 1946 to 1958 were analyzed to uncover Aboriginal students' recreational experiences.Specifically, three research questions were addressed: (1) What role did recreation play in Canadian residential schools?(2) How did Aboriginal students experience recreation in these institutions?and (3) What values did students report from their recreational experiences?Results indicate substantial diversity within both the types of recreational activities students experienced and the values students' reported surrounding these recreational pursuits.This study represents an entry point into better understanding recreation's historic place within Canada's residential school system.Overall, this study unpacks recreation's diverse roles in two Canadian residential schools from a range of student perspectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it