MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005607365

Resilient Cartographies: A Systems Analysis of Resilience Among Indian Women Immigrants in Canada

2022· other· en· W7005607365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationThrivingImmigration policyPsychological resiliencePopulationGovernment (linguistics)Resilience (materials science)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most of Canada’s population growth is driven by immigration. In 2020, over 80% of Canada’s population growth came from immigration, with more than half of this number being economic immigrants admitted primarily to meet labour-market shortages. Among these, the incoming numbers from India have been the highest. This number is likely to grow in the coming years as the government calibrates immigration policies to meet its economic (labour-market), political (nation-building), and social (demographic) objectives. Moreover, from an individual perspective, it is clear that many are choosing Canada as their choice of immigration destination over other countries. 
\n
\nGiven this context, the study looks at individual immigration journeys of women and acts of resilience within them through a human-centered systems focus. Immigration is a journey of change and uncertainty. Immigrant women from India adapt to vast amounts of changes, losses, and unpredictabilities throughout their journeys across both internal and external realms. The research examines how women immigrants from India adapt to these ambivalences and remain resilient. 
\n
\nThe report traces an individual journey through stages including planning, moving, arriving, settling, integrating, and thriving and examines the cycles of change and resilience while unpacking the invisible systemic factors that influence each stage. Additionally, the research contests the policy gaze, which adopts a simplistic and prototypical view of the immigration journey by uncovering five immigration patterns or pathways that frame individual journeys. These include linear, serial, circular, onward, and return migration. Individuals who move in these patterns possess unique mental models and behaviours and relate differently to their immigration experience. 
\n
\nThis understanding of fragmented and nonlinear journeys presents novel individual and systemic intervention opportunities. The study concludes with sixteen thought-starters for innovation. The purpose is to engage multi-stakeholder dialogue and co-creation to design an ecosystem of support that promotes immigrant communities’ capacities for resilience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University)Same topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207