Review of <i>Indian Fall: The Last Great Days of the PlainsCree and the Blackfoot Confederacy</i> By D'ArcyJenish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Indian Fall, D'Arcy Jenish recounts the history of "grave injustice" and the ultimate devastation of the Plains Cree and the Blackfoot Confederacy through the dramatic telling of the intertwining life stories of the nations' leaders-Piapot, Big Bear, Crowfoot, and Poundmaker. Jenish is an author with a mission. He challenges the mainstream historical portrayal of these leaders as "felons" and "traitors" by relating their stories from an empathetic "Aboriginal perspective," concluding that they were major players in Canadian history and that their heroic efforts are worthy of our respect and admiration. The book is divided into four parts. The first, "Buffalo Days," provides biographical, cultural, and historical contexts for the four leaders. The second section, "Freedom's End," chronicles the events that occurred from 1866 to 1884. In this relatively short period, the Plains Cree and Blackfoot encountered catastrophic changes in their lives in the face of the oncoming of Euro-Canadian settlement, alienation from their land base, and their incorporation into the nation-state of Canada. The focus is on the events leading up to the Northwest Rebellion of 1885. In the third section, "A New World Rises," Jenish revisits the four Plains leaders and traces the final demise of their communities as well as their own personal "falls" in the aftermath of 1885. A brief "Epilogue" closes with a tribute to these leaders, who "fought to preserve what they could of their communities and their cultures, their freedom and their independence, their pride and their dignity, their way of living, thinking and being." Jenish has set out to breathe life into the telling of history through a style his publisher describes as fusing the "immediacy of journalism" and the "intimacy of fiction." This is a history written for a general audience. Highly readable, Jenish's writing captures his readers' imaginations through the extensive use of anecdotes often narrated in the first person. It will be a frustrating volume for professional historians and researchers who may wish to follow up on Jenish's sources since no specific document location references are provided for the large number of citations. In terms of prairie historiography, Jenish overstates his claim that historians have focused on "portraying the transformation of the Prairies as a triumphant accomplishment" of fur traders, railway builders, mounties and homesteaders (Canadian national heroes) at the expense of the experiences and perspectives of Natives inhabitants. For the past three decades, several historians have directed their research and writing towards providing a more balanced history of the interrelationships between Aboriginal populations and Euro-Canadians. This is evident in Jenish's bibliography which not only includes the autobiographies of Aboriginal leaders such as Edward Ahenakew, Joseph Dion, Fine Day, and Abel Watetch, but also the historical biographies on the four leaders produced by Hugh Dempsey, Donald Barnett, and J. R. Miller.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".