MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005630144

Review of <i>Indian Fall: The Last Great Days of the PlainsCree and the Blackfoot Confederacy</i> By D'ArcyJenish

2001· article· en· W7005630144 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGloomCircumstantial evidencePretextSubject (documents)Government (linguistics)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Indian Fall, D'Arcy Jenish recounts the history of "grave injustice" and the ultimate devastation of the Plains Cree and the Blackfoot Confederacy through the dramatic telling of the intertwining life stories of the nations' leaders-Piapot, Big Bear, Crowfoot, and Poundmaker. Jenish is an author with a mission. He challenges the mainstream historical portrayal of these leaders as "felons" and "traitors" by relating their stories from an empathetic "Aboriginal perspective," concluding that they were major players in Canadian history and that their heroic efforts are worthy of our respect and admiration. The book is divided into four parts. The first, "Buffalo Days," provides biographical, cultural, and historical contexts for the four leaders. The second section, "Freedom's End," chronicles the events that occurred from 1866 to 1884. In this relatively short period, the Plains Cree and Blackfoot encountered catastrophic changes in their lives in the face of the oncoming of Euro-Canadian settlement, alienation from their land base, and their incorporation into the nation-state of Canada. The focus is on the events leading up to the Northwest Rebellion of 1885. In the third section, "A New World Rises," Jenish revisits the four Plains leaders and traces the final demise of their communities as well as their own personal "falls" in the aftermath of 1885. A brief "Epilogue" closes with a tribute to these leaders, who "fought to preserve what they could of their communities and their cultures, their freedom and their independence, their pride and their dignity, their way of living, thinking and being." Jenish has set out to breathe life into the telling of history through a style his publisher describes as fusing the "immediacy of journalism" and the "intimacy of fiction." This is a history written for a general audience. Highly readable, Jenish's writing captures his readers' imaginations through the extensive use of anecdotes often narrated in the first person. It will be a frustrating volume for professional historians and researchers who may wish to follow up on Jenish's sources since no specific document location references are provided for the large number of citations. In terms of prairie historiography, Jenish overstates his claim that historians have focused on "portraying the transformation of the Prairies as a triumphant accomplishment" of fur traders, railway builders, mounties and homesteaders (Canadian national heroes) at the expense of the experiences and perspectives of Natives inhabitants. For the past three decades, several historians have directed their research and writing towards providing a more balanced history of the interrelationships between Aboriginal populations and Euro-Canadians. This is evident in Jenish's bibliography which not only includes the autobiographies of Aboriginal leaders such as Edward Ahenakew, Joseph Dion, Fine Day, and Abel Watetch, but also the historical biographies on the four leaders produced by Hugh Dempsey, Donald Barnett, and J. R. Miller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207