RIG: Kulturhistorisk tidskrift 2025:1-2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
KULTURHISTORISK TIDSKRIFT Tidskriften utges fr.o.m. årg. 98, 2015, av Kungl. Gustav Adolfs Akademien för svensk folkkultur, en riksakademi med sitt säte i Uppsala INLEDNING VI GÖR KUNGLIGHET: KRITISKA PERSPEKTIV PÅ DEN SVENSKA MONARKIN <i>Mattias Frihammar, My Hellsing och Kristina Widestedt, gästredaktörer</i> LYSANDE UPPDRAG: BERNADOTTE-DYNASTINS KUNGLIGA HISTORIOGRAFER, 1930-1960-TAL<i> My Hellsing</i> MONARKINS SKYLTFÖNSTER: @KUNGAHUSET PÅ INSTAGRAM <i>Kristina Widestedt</i> ANTECKNINGAR SILVERTRONEN <i>Cecilia Åse</i> EN QUEER MONARKI? GAYVÄNLIGHET I TIDEN OCH DET OPOLITISKAS GRÄNSER <i>Emil Edenborg</i> MONARKIN OCH MILITAREN <i>Maria Wendt</i> BILAGA 1: KUNGEN 50 AR PÅ TRONEN - EN VETENSKAPLIG SOARÉ OM MONARKINS MAGI, MENING OCH MAKT 2: FORSKARE OCH SKÅDESPELARE PÅ SAMMA SCEN - EFTERSNACK NYA AVHANDLINGAR Lenita Kefala INGET RIKTIGT HEM: KVINNORS ERFARENHETER AV DEN TILLFÄLLIGA BOSTADSMARKNADEN I STOCKHOLM <i>Anmäld av Anna Sofia Lundgren</i> RECENSIONER Bo Lönnqvist, Anna-Maria Åström & Susanne Österlund-Pötzsch NATUREN OCH PLATSERNA <i>rec. 128 sidor, 2025, Häftad, Svenska, 132 kr
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".