MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005662207

Rôles des cellules myéloïdes dans la régénérescence d'axones lésés

2009· other· fr· W7005662207 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval) · 2009
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAnimal modelInterleukin 15ImmunosurveillanceHematopoietic cell
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Encore aujourd'hui, les lésions de la moelle épinière représentent un défi colossal pour la science et la médecine. La découverte d'un traitement efficace nécessitera un approfondissement des connaissances sur les processus cellulaires et moléculaires qui sont déclenchés à la suite de la lésion, notamment concernant la réponse inflammatoire et la dégénérescence wallérienne puisque ces deux réponses pourraient influencer la régénérescence d'axones lésés. À ce sujet, nous avons récemment démontré qu'il est possible d'induire une déplétion importante des cellules myéloïdes CD Il b + chez des souris transgéniques exprimant une forme mutée du gène suicide HSV -TKmt 30 sous le contrôle du promoteur CD Il b, un promoteur spécifique aux macrophages et aux granulocytes. Nos résultats indiquent que les cellules CD Il b + sont essentielles à la régénérescence d'axones périphériques et centraux en favorisant l'élimination des débris de myéline et des inhibiteurs de croissance axonale associés à ceux-ci de même que via la synthèse de facteurs neurotrophiques et pro-angiogéniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval)Same topicPhytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus speciesFrench-language works237,207