MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7005668568

Recent evolution of rainfall extremes in Niger (1950-2014)

2017· article· fr· W7005668568 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsGDG Environnement
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101LiquationDysgeusiaDiafiltrationEmperipolesisTriacetinDurvalumab
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

West Africa is the region of the world with the highest recent rainfall deficit.Niger, one of the poorest countries in the world, is highly dependent on rainfall variations in the context of global warming, the consequences of which seem to be unfavorable in the coming decades.Based on the daily rainfall data of 37 Nigerien stations, this article analyzes the evolution of precipitation through eleven indices between 1950 and 2014.After a severe drought of three decades which is individualized from 1968 to 1997, it appears that if a return at subnormal annual average rainfall is observed since 1998, this is not the case for other vital indices for the rural world, depending on the good distribution of rainfall during the rainy season.Indeed, the consecutive dry days have increased and the consecutive wet days have been reduced.The same goes for rainy days.At the same time, the proportion of daily maximum precipitation in the total annual rainfall has increased over time and the proportion of intense rainfall in the annual rainfall totals has increased significantly in the last two decades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)→Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy→French-language works237,207→