Seminario Internacional Nuevas formas de ver la Arquitectura: Substancia sobe el espectáculo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arquitecto por la Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, con maestría europea en Diagnóstico y Reparación de Edificaciones por la Universidad de Sevilla, con especialidad en Regeneración Urbana por el Politécnico de Lublin. Además, posee estudios de posgrado en Manejo de Edificaciones Históricas en la Universidad de Lund y en Proyectos Culturales para el Desarrollo en el Centro Internacional de Formación OIT / Università di Torino y cursos especializados en charrettes de diseño urbano acreditados por el National Charrete Institute y la Universidad de Harvard. Héctor reside en Vancouver donde está colegiado y trabaja para Merrick Architecture. Anteriormente ha trabajado para Walter Weberhofer, el Instituto Getty en Los Ángeles. Ha colaborado con el MoMA y ha escrito sobre historia de la arquitectura y del urbanismo en Arkinka, The Plan (Bologna), Summa+, Planning Perspectives y Site. Es miembro de la Sociedad de Historiadores de Arquitectura, la Fundación Arthur Erickson e ICOMOS Canadá.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".